"The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God”- Was famous error in the opening of Psalm 14 in a 1763 printing of the KJV – the printers were fined a huge (for the time) £3000 and all copies were destroyed.
Who are the real fools?
By
Credo Quia Absurdum
"The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God”- Was famous error in the opening of Psalm 14 in a 1763 printing of the KJV – the printers were fined a huge (for the time) £3000 and all copies were destroyed.
"The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God”- Was famous error in the opening of Psalm 14 in a 1763 printing of the KJV – the printers were fined a huge (for the time) £3000 and all copies were destroyed.
Special Feature: I Want to Break Free - By our new writer T.F.
Editor's Note: I've been trying to get this guy to write for us for years and at last he has agreed. It is my pleasure to introduce one of my very best friends and someone for whom I have the greatest respect: T.F.BY T.F.
This website brings me more pleasure .... and painful memories...than I can put in words. I just read that awesome and heart wrenching post by Sam and his process of his de-conversion. It's heart-wrenching and jaw dropping at the same time, because of course I lived through the same thing myself.
Evolution Never Stops
![]() |
| The bacterium have evolved 50,000 generations over 25 years |
Source: Click Here
Evolution is relentless process that seems to keep going and going, even when creatures live in a stable, unchanging world.
Asyncritus answered by Jerry Coyne
Editor's Note: Jerry Coyne is an American professor of biology, known for his commentary on the intelligent design debate. A prolific scientist, he has published dozens of papers, elucidating on the theory of evolution. He is currently a professor at the University of Chicago in the Department of Ecology and Evolution.'Asyncritus' (we all know who he is) challenges Ken Gilmore
By Asyncritus
Editor's Note: The Ken-Cat won't answer this challenge and in a way I don't blame him. But we can answer Asyncritus in the comments below. If we do, it will put a smile on the face of the Ken-Cat and he will think to himself "I taught them well; all the work I put into ECACP was not in vain."
Common descent and the curious origin of human chromosome 2
By Ken Gilmore Source: Click hereEditor's Note: The Ken-Cat is a Theist who does not endorse either the contents or purpose of this website. However he does allow us to re-blog his work for which we thank him.
Thoughts from another young deconverted Christadelphian
Are you recovering from the Australian Christadelphian Conference?
Evolutionary Creationism: A Guide for the Perplexed (Parts 1 - 3) - By Ken Gilmore
Editor's Note: Another article by the Ken-Cat. I don't agree with much of what he has written and Ken does not agree with much of what I write. He is a Theist and I am not. But for those Christadelphians who want to reconcile science with the Bible and keep their Theism; this is undoubtedly the route to go.
This is how we see the religion (3)
"The Amazing Spider" - Bro David Pearce (UK)
- Christadelphian Australian Conference January 2014http://eprogram.melbourne2014.com.au/variety5.html
"This PowerPoint presentation shows that the complexity of life on earth cannot be satisfactorily explained without God's involvement. Only Divine wisdom could have put together the Garden Spider and the Human Ear. Ideal for young people studying biology at school or university."
- Christadelphian Australian Conference January 2014http://eprogram.melbourne2014.com.au/variety5.html
'Taking Genesis literally'
Interesting discussion developing at: http://scribalishess.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/reading-genesis-1-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-3You might want to join in. Thanks to the Ken-Cat for finding it.
A New Year's Day deconversion story
Corky & John on Evolution
A hyper-sexualised media is bad news for women. (Looks like Christians were right after all)
![]() |
| Miley Cyrus has caught Ken Gilmore's attention |
Editor's Note: Ken has kindly agreed to allow us republish articles from his blog again, for which I thank him. But what's even better news is that he is now going to write articles that we can publish on subjects of a broader apologetic focus . This will give us the opportunity to discuss the issues that he raises and to determine if we agree with his arguments.
Hope or Hype?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












