Our Mission
To reflect our new focus on Christadelphian young people, 'Our Mission' page has been revised and rewritten.
Christmas Day Special Bonus - Turning the World Upside Down - Six Articles On The Role of Women in the Church
By Ex-Christadelphian Peter Baylis
PART 1: JESUS’ ATTITUDE TO WOMEN
PART 1: JESUS’ ATTITUDE TO WOMEN
Christmas Day Special Bonus - YEC Target Practice 2: David Pearce - David gets his answer
By David PearceAs author of the booklet (Evidence for Design) I would like to reply to my (anonymous) critic.
Sadly, his/her review is full of errors.
A Response to Bernard Burt's "Trial by Prophecy" Challenge
By Credo Quia AbsurdumI would like to rise Bernard Burt’s “final challenge” of the hand out “Trial by Prophecy” listing 11 Bible prophecies which man has (apparently) been unable to overturn.
YEC Target Practice: Bernard Burt
Editor's Note: I posted this from Bernard, for a few hours, a couple of days ago, hoping that Ken Gilmore would take aim at it. Then I deleted it.
But I acted too soon and tonight Ken put a few rounds on the target on his Facebook page as follows:
Editor's Note: I posted this from Bernard, for a few hours, a couple of days ago, hoping that Ken Gilmore would take aim at it. Then I deleted it.But I acted too soon and tonight Ken put a few rounds on the target on his Facebook page as follows:
A Christmas Poem
By MancottIt was Sunday in a small town Ecclesia, it had fallen on a bright Christmas Day
The President said "Now please bow your heads we are just now a-goin` to pray"
A critical response to Nigel Bernard's Dec 2013 response to criticism of his Nov 2013 article
By Ken GilmoreSource: Click here.
Nigel Bernard, co-author of the YEC cover article in the Nov 2013 issue of The Christadelphian elected not to employ Don Pearce’s ill-fated strategy of trying to attack the science behind radiometric dating.
More YEC geriatric nonsense from the Christadelphians
Contributed by an Ex-ChristadelphianThis is from a recent edition of 'The Lampstand'
A critical response to Don Pearce's Dec 2013 response to criticism of his Nov 2013 article - 3
By Ken Gilmore. Source: Click here.
Editor's Note:
Whilst I stand aside from the Theistic content of what follows, it is still a brilliant article with some well reasoned argument by Ken.
Editor's Note:
Whilst I stand aside from the Theistic content of what follows, it is still a brilliant article with some well reasoned argument by Ken.
A critical response to Don Pearce's Dec 2013 response to criticism of his Nov 2013 article - 2
By Ken Gilmore. Source: Click here.
Editor's Note: More from the keyboard of Christadelphian Doctor Ken Gilmore. The Christadelphian community have never seen anything like it. He's singlehandedly dragging them into the 21st Century.
The Christadelphian Office on Facebook (3)
This is my third comment on the Christadelphian office Facebook page. The previous two were deleted. It's in answer to Peter, who questioned me about something.
The Christadelphian Office on Facebook (2)
Like my previous comment they may have deleted or hid it by now. But don't be deterred; answer my comment as if it were still showing.
VIDEO: How we found out evolution is true: John van Wyhe at TEDxNTU
Thanks to Ken Gilmore for finding this great video
The Christadelphian Office on Facebook (1)
The Facebook page of the Christadelphian office (click here) is a collection of shallow platitudes, mixed with a smug, holier-than-thou attitude that judges everyone except Christadelphians. It appears to be intended as some sort of encouragement to the elderly and those with very little intelligence. Forged
By MancottA very good overview of Bart Erhman`s book "Forged" can be found by Googling:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forged
A critical response to Don Pearce's Dec 2013 response to criticism of his Nov 2013 Christadelphian Magazine article - 1
By Ken Gilmore. Source: Click here.Editor's Note: I don't agree with the Theistic content of this article, but as we have an ever increasing number of Theist Christadelphians reading our website, this piece should be of interest to them.
How big was the human population bottleneck? Another staple of theology refuted.
A new paper in Nature by Heng Li and Richard Durbin contains estimates of the “effective population size” of our ancestors at different points in evolutionary time.
Young Earth Creationism in the November 2013 edition of The Christadelphian Magazine
By Ken Gilmore. Source: Click here.
I’ve already commented on how The Testimony has sunk to a new low with the publication in the November 2013 edition of an anti-evolution article that employed the intellectually and morally dishonest practice of quote mining in its attacks on evolutionary biology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)