![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwQjHyUfqU2wmUnOrD_8wgZk6_PsKPIeafYm7w8fwC0zVKKlFxewZRJBis25Mf85B9LXruz546MpkF1kqzfEd3AwoEOKOx5IIo6lIylfKH_SqLyP-Mcfca3CQIZExgGRDfCN1k74jpS1o/s200/christmas-911251_1280.jpg)
A few days ago, I discussed a positive case for the resurrection story having grown over time. There is a similar case for Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem being a later addition, though it’s a lot simpler: Only Matthew and Luke make explicit claims about Jesus being born in Bethlehem, they have completely separate stories, and prophecy gives a good reason for them to want to claim a birth in Bethlehem.
Click here to read the rest of this article
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please do not comment as 'Anonymous'. Rather, choose 'Name/URL' and use a fake name. The URL can be left blank. This makes it easier to see who is replying to whom.